Free offers like $10 free no deposit mobile casino reward you for simply registering with the casino or for being a loyal customer. Players can find a $10 free no deposit casino bonus that will give them free gifts even before making the first deposit. Suppose you receive a $10 free no deposit bonus with a wagering requirement of 10x. In order to receive any winnings you have picked up, you must wager a minimum of £100 on eligible games. Usually, the offers are in the form of in-game cash bonuses, free spins, free tries, plus more! No deposit bonuses are becoming more and more popular with online casinos and their fans. 25 The Goofy Gophers enter a food processing factory with determination to reclaim their vegetables confiscated by “vandals”, Bugs tells to a wizened man the story of what prompted a ruffian gambler desiring a lucky rabbit’s foot to leap off of the side of the Brooklyn Bridge, and Sylvester and Tweety are snowbound in a cabin where the larder only contains bird seed.
3 Bugs emerges victorious against his bovine foe in a bullfight ring, Sylvester acts to protect Tweety from an orange cat’s hungry clutches, for Granny has threatened a violin string fate for Sylvester should any harm befall Tweety, and Henery Hawk is lectured by Foghorn Leghorn on the necessity of “starting small” in his quest for chicken flesh. 12 Foghorn Leghorn shakes “boy genius” Egghead Jr.’s chemical concoction and is recipient of a violent explosion, Daffy, desperate to win against Bugs in a competition for theatre audience approval, swallows highly volatile fluids for a sensational act that can only be performed once, and a parrot connives to eliminate the stupid house cat with whom he shares his master’s home and who precedes him in inheriting their master’s affluent legacy. Who doesn’t like getting something for nothing? And who can blame them? And almost instantly give you in-game cash or chips that can be used on their site without depositing any of your own money.
No deposit bonuses are another way for an online casino to compete with others and encourage new players to join their site. What level of script literacy are you assuming on your users ? No Script literacy should be assumed. I agree that rather than supporting all of Script it would be better to support a “safe”, analyzable subset of Script: that’s Miniscript :p I also believe supporting any new Script capabilities without Miniscript would be a huge footgun. Also, as Kevin mentioned, anything would be better than an address anyways. The attack Kevin is talking about is a (expected-to-be-stateless) HM will happily sign a cancel of deterrent transaction that spends an already-signed input. E.g in Lightning, even if you pre-sign a justice transaction punishing every revokeable outputs on counterparty transaction, and one input is spent, will current HWs prevent you to-resign an updated justice transaction ? Of course, Miniscript Policy makes things easier, but IMHO, I still hope to see some mature, higher-level language (e.g Ivy) to ease script semantic understanding and thus widen the crowd of users. Time-sensitive L2 protocols have a wide scope to check, e.g not verifying the nSequence/nLocktime fields can provoke funds failures. Funds holders are expected to have a routine signing of cancel / deterrent / unvault transactions and share them with the watchtowers.
That’s why most online casinos offer a bonus with wagering requirements when you register as a new user or are a loyal customer already. Wagering requirements keep you focused on playing games, not taking up time. They`re a great way to get more value from your initial deposit and help you build a bigger bankroll faster so that you can keep coming back again and again. In general, the more you bet, the more likely you are to win, and vice versa. I understand them, Script is full of subtleties, taproot is likely to have more of them and if you take sighash malleability that’s not something you want your average user to play with. I can see enterprise/hobbyist folks to know enough of Script to understand the intended behavior but I don’t think that’s a reasonable assumption for your average user. I believe with Miniscript Policy (with possibly alias instead of pubkeys, see below) we are to the highest possible level of abstraction without loss of meaning for user verification. I don’t see the exact issue here.
